Many of these women work. Many of them are in book clubs. Many of them are involved in causes. But this is how they choose to represent themselves. The choice may seem trivial, but the whole idea behind Facebook is to create a social persona, an image of who you are projected into hundreds of bedrooms and cafes and offices across the country. Why would that image be of someone else, however closely bound they are to your life, genetically and otherwise?
And maybe this is a good point. But what I personally find more disturbing are the avatars on pregnancy and birth forums. This one is indicative;

What is in those sparkles? There are others too: cartoon avatars, all in pink and purple, show wide-eyed Manga-style girls, surrounded by rainbows or small fluffy genetic mutants. Still others allow you to fill in an automatically created by-line to go at the end of your post; women have their names, followed by a list of their babies' birthdates, weights and favourite poo colour. The most sadly disturbing ones are the miscarriages; where women refer to their children as "One in heaven (date) one on earth (date) and one in my arms". Sometimes there's just not enough sparkles to go around.
I guess my point is that if someone in gender studies is lining up a thesis on mother's Facebook pictures, they might want to first peer into the disturbing (but sparkley!) world of forum avatars. The transaction is clear: baby for brain - it's a simple swap.
I'd post more pictures, but if I look at any more pregnancy and birth forums my baby will simply get out and walk. Like many pregnant women, though, I've read my fair share of tales of woe and horror on the internet. What struck me most recently though, has been the tendency, almost always on American forums, to talk about the baby's head coming out of the vagina like some kind of elaborate Japanese horror film.
Many women complain that their midwives tell them to reach down and gently pull their babies from their vaginas. They shriek: Isn't this what you are paying the midwife for? Because, God forbid, I might want to acknowledge that my baby is coming out of my beautiful sparkley hoo-hoo! They are seriously traumatised by pullingl the baby out of their bellies. Where do they think it's been all this time?
It was about this point that I realised I might be approaching these stories on a slightly different footing. If there's horror it's because it hurts like fuck, not because the baby is "dangling half out of your vagina" (actually a verbatim quote from a forum-poster). I find the idea of hooking the baby out of a slit in your belly slightly more unsettling than out of your vagina, but elective c sections are considered completely unremarkable by many women.
It's odd, but we're becoming increasingly distanced from our bodies, as we battle our nether regions with scented toilet paper (ours is shit-scented), applicator tampons and floral douches ("My hoo-hoo smells as fresh as a veteran's casket, thanks to FemFresh!").
How did we get to the point where surgery seems natural and pushing a baby out of your vagina is trauma-inducing bizarro?
